MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529809648 · doi:10.4000/geomorphologie.11479

Construction and deflation of irrigation soils from the Pharaonic to the Roman period at Amheida (Trimithis), Dakhla Depression, Egyptian Western Desert

2016· article· en· W2529809648 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Paul Bravard, Ashraf Mostafa, Paola Davoli, Katherine A. Adelsberger, Pascale Ballet, Romain Garcier, Lucio Calcagnile, Gianluca Quarta

Bibliographic record

VenueGéomorphologie relief processus environnement · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsGeoarchaeologyPeriod (music)HoloceneArchaeologyPlateau (mathematics)GeologyHuman settlementGeographySpring (device)Physical geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most of the environmental studies performed in the Western Desert of Egypt have dealt with climate change since the Late Pleistocene, notably with the humid Holocene (10000 to 4500 cal. BC) and following desertification. In the last dry period of the Holocene, human societies had to cope with changing environments and they selected refuges where water was permanently available. Some of the archaeological investigations in the Western Desert have studied the available water resources and the role of irrigation in the building of soils. In some cases, they have explained the abandonment of sites by the progressive depletion of water resources. This paper focuses on the site of Amheida (the Roman Trimithis) located in the Dakhla depression in the Western Desert of Egypt. It is an elongated area located south of a limestone plateau, where spring mounds provided abundant water during the period of occupation, which lasted from the Old Kingdom (2700 cal. BC) to the Late Roman period (end of the 4th century AD). Trimithis was abandoned after a long period of prosperity. The reasons for its abandonment, as well as that of other settlements in the oasis in the same period, have not been clarified yet.Geoarchaeological surveys carried out in 2011 and 2013 point to several phases including 1) the use of a spring mound during part of the Pharaonic period (2700 to 1069 cal. BC) and the formation of irrigation soils in the vicinity of spring mounds from the Late Pharaonic times (712 to 332 BC) to the beginning of the Roman period (30 BC); 2) the degradation of these soils by wind deflation in the irrigated perimeter during the early Roman period; 3) a recovery until the 3rd century AD, made possible by the digging of wells, before 4) a severe phase of deflation and sand drifting which destroyed the irrigation soils and forced farmers to till the poorly irrigated bedrock.The Trimithis case exemplifies the way former societies could cope with harsh constraints (aridity, drifting sand and wind erosion) as long as water was plentiful. Water scarcity due to the progressive depletion of groundwater resources was probably compensated by an increase in human labour until thresholds were crossed, recovery being impossible due to water scarcity. A model summarizes the main findings of this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéomorphologie relief processus environnementSame topicArchaeology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207