MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2531066886 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2016.2616283

Surviving Multiple Failures in Multicast Virtual Networks With Virtual Machines Migration

2016· article· en· W2531066886 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulaziz M. Ghaleb, Tarek Khalifa, Sara Ayoubi, Khaled Shaban, Chadi Assi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersQatar Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceMulticastComputer networkNode (physics)Quality of serviceDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the multiple link/node substrate failures that impact a multicast virtual network (MVN) in which link recovery is not feasible and node migration is mandatory. A novel restoration approach is introduced to repair the failed MVNs while maintaining their quality of service requirements (e.g., end-to-end delay and delay variations). This approach relies on reducing the search region and exploiting nodes ranking and filtering (NRF) techniques to speed up the recovery process of finding an alternative node to which to migrate. The performance is extensively evaluated against multiple failures, with and without NRF, compared with complete re-embedding technique, link failure algorithms for single link failure, and previous work for single node failure. Simulation results prove that our recovery technique achieves good restoration ratio in considerably fast execution time, low link mapping cost (gain) with a slight impact on the admission ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service ManagementSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207