MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2531084085 · doi:10.11159/cdsr16.121

Application of Newton/GMRES Method to Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Functional Electrical Stimulation

2016· article· en· W2531084085 on OpenAlexafffund
Naser Mehrabi, Sadegh Tajeddin, Nasser L. Azad, John McPhee

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic systems, and Robotics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsGeneralized minimal residual methodNonlinear systemNewton's methodModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear modelComputer scienceStimulationFunctional electrical stimulationControl (management)Iterative methodAlgorithmPhysicsArtificial intelligenceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies have shown that functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy can improve the motor recovery and range of the motion of stroke patients.The state-of-the-art functional electrical stimulators are open-loop control systems, i.e., the controller is unaware of the patient's posture and progress during the therapy.In this research, we have developed a closed-loop Newton/GMRES nonlinear model predictive controller that measures the patient posture and controls the muscle stimulation to reach a desired posture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic systems, and RoboticsSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207