MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2531170944 · doi:10.1109/temc.2016.2611672

A Modified Enhanced Transmission Line Theory Applied to Multiconductor Transmission Lines

2016· article· en· W2531170944 on OpenAlexaff
Sofiane Ben Chabane, Philippe Besnier, Marco Klingler

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsSafe Engineering Services & Technologies (Canada)
FundersPermitting, Siting and Analysis
KeywordsTransmission lineTelegrapher's equationsElectric power transmissionSolverFormalism (music)Maxwell's equationsComputational electromagneticsMathematical analysisPhysicsClassical electromagnetismElectromagnetic fieldMathematicsClassical mechanicsComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a multiconductor modified enhanced transmission line theory is presented. The constitutive equations of this theory are directly derived from Maxwell's equations without the restriction to the transverse electromagnetic mode, while conserving the mathematical formalism of the classical transmission line theory (TLT). However, the per-unit-length (p.u.l.) parameters become complex and frequency dependent but still have an RLCG form. Besides, these new parameters are expressed as a combination of the classical ones and a high-frequency correction. These equations can be easily solved by the existing classical TLT solvers. The results obtained by this theory are in a much better agreement than the classical TLT with those predicted by a full-wave solver or measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic CompatibilitySame topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207