MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2532320222 · doi:10.14257/ijsip.2016.9.9.28

A New Low Complexity NLOS Identification Approach Based on Maximum Slope and Skewness of Energy Block for 60GHz System

2016· article· en· W2532320222 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Signal Processing Image Processing and Pattern Recognition · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersOcean University of China
KeywordsSkewnessNon-line-of-sight propagationIdentification (biology)Block (permutation group theory)Computer scienceEnergy (signal processing)StatisticsMathematicsTelecommunicationsWirelessGeometryBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major problem of indoor localization is the presence of non-line-of-sight (NLOS) channels. In order to perform the NLOS identification, in this paper, we propose a novel NLOS identification technique based on the ratio values of the maximum slope and skewness of energy block of the received signal using energy detector. In particular, the IEEE 802.15.3c 60 GHz channel models are used as examples and the above statistics is found to be explained in detail. The simplicity of the proposed approach lies in the use of the parameters of the energy-based time of arrival (TOA) Estimation algorithm. The CM1 (LOS) and CM2 (NLOS) channel models of the standard IEEE 802.15.3c channel models are used. Numerical simulations results show that the correct identification of channel models with the proposed approach is better than with the multipath channel statistics based approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it