Sound-Event Classification Using Robust Texture Features for Robot Hearing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sound-event classification often utilizes time-frequency analysis, which produces an image-like spectrogram. Recent approaches such as spectrogram image features and subband power distribution image features extract the image local statistics such as mean and variance from the spectrogram. They have demonstrated good performance. However, we argue that such simple image statistics cannot well capture the complex texture details of the spectrogram. Thus, we propose to extract the local binary pattern (LBP) from the logarithm of the Gammatone-like spectrogram. However, the LBP feature is sensitive to noise. After analyzing the spectrograms of sound events and the audio noise, we find that the magnitude of pixel differences, which is discarded by the LBP feature, carries important information for sound-event classification. We thus propose a multichannel LBP feature via pixel difference quantization to improve the robustness to the audio noise. In view of the differences between spectrograms and natural images, and the reliability issues of LBP features, we propose two projection-based LBP features to better capture the texture information of the spectrogram. To validate the proposed multichannel projection-based LBP features for robot hearing, we have built a new sound-event classification database, the NTU-SEC database, in the context of social interaction between human and robot. It is publicly available to promote research on sound-event classification in a social context. The proposed approaches are compared with the state of the art on the RWCP database and the NTU-SEC database. They consistently demonstrate superior performance under various noise conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".