MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2534754645 · doi:10.1109/ias.2001.955702

Spline-based analysis of electric arc furnaces

2002· article· en· W2534754645 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInduction Heating and Inverter Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpline (mechanical)Electric arcElectric arc furnaceWaveformVoltageComputer scienceAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)MathematicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringElectrodeMaterials scienceArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a method based on the theory of spline functions is developed to estimate the optimal operating conditions of electric arc furnaces. Voltage and current waveforms with distortions are approximated by spline polynomials. These spline polynomials are used in the time-domain analysis of a furnace power circuit. The active power deployed at the tips of the furnace electrodes is determined by the overlapping of the voltage and current splines. The optimal phase angle to deliver maximum active power depends on the relative position of these waveforms. Results from the application of the proposed spline technique to data from a simulator and an actual furnace are compared against the traditional optimization method. It is shown that the proposed spline technique outperforms the traditional one. Conclusions addressing the advantages and limitations of the spline-based analysis of electric arc furnaces are given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it