NURSE LEADERSHIP PRACTICES IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE: A GROUNDED THEORY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This is a qualitative study and its aim was to understand the meaning of nurse leadership exercised in the services of Primary Health Care in a municipality located in Southern Region of Brazil. Grounded Theory was used as methodological framework. Data collection was carried out with semi-structured interviews applied to 30 nurses who worked in Primary Health Care and nursing professors, divided into four groups, between 2011 and 2012. After the analysis process, nine categories emerged and sustained the phenomenon 'Revealing the nursing leadership practices in the complex context of Primary Health Care'. Leadership was understood as a resource in the process of caring/managing people and developing a team of leaders, intending the organization and qualification of health work. It is important to rescue the clinical work of nurses, in order to keep their investment in the health team and to strengthen the binomial leader/caregiver.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it