MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2534851334 · doi:10.1109/cacsd.2016.7602547

Computing maximal invariant sets for switched nonlinear systems

2016· article· en· W2534851334 on OpenAlexaff
Yinan Li, Jun Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemInvariant (physics)Control theory (sociology)ComputationMathematicsNonlinear dynamical systemsDynamical systems theoryDiscrete time and continuous timeNonlinear controlInvariant polynomialApplied mathematicsPolynomialComputer scienceMathematical analysisAlgorithmControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMatrix polynomial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Invariant sets play a fundamental role in the analysis and control design of dynamical systems. In this paper, we consider computation of maximal invariant sets for discrete-time switched nonlinear systems. Switched nonlinear systems are described as a family of nonlinear systems with a discrete variable that decides which mode will be active at a specific time. We consider two scenarios: one leads to the computation of switching controlled invariant sets and the other leads to computation of invariant sets subject to arbitrary switching. The main result of the paper establishes that the outer approximations computed using interval analysis indeed converge to the maximal invariant sets for general switched nonlinear systems without any stability assumptions. The proposed method is illustrated with nonlinear systems with polynomial dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207