MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2535399616 · doi:10.14288/1.0305711

Short-term hydro-meteorological forecasting with extreme learning machines

2016· article· en· W2535399616 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)MeteorologyEnvironmental scienceClimatologyWeather forecastingComputer scienceGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In machine learning (ML), the extreme learning machine (ELM), a feedforward neural network model which assigns random weights in the single hidden layer and optimizes only the weights in the output layer, has the fully nonlinear modelling capability of the traditional artificial neural network (ANN) model but is solved via linear least squares, as in multiple linear regression (MLR). Chapter 2 evaluated ELM against MLR and three nonlinear ML methods (ANN, support vector regression and random forest) on nine environmental regression problems. ELM was then developed for short-term forecasting of hydro-meteorological variables. In situations where new data arrive continually, the need to make frequent model updates often renders ANN impractical. An online learning algorithm – the online sequential extreme learning machine (OSELM) – is automatically updated inexpensively as new data arrive. In Chapter 3, OSELM was applied to forecast daily streamflow at two small watersheds in British Columbia, Canada, at lead times of 1–3 days. Predictors used were weather forecast data generated by the NOAA Global Ensemble Forecasting System (GEFS), and local hydro-meteorological observations. OSELM forecasts were tested with daily, monthly or yearly model updates, with the nonlinear OSELM easily outperforming the benchmark, the online sequential MLR (OSMLR). A major limitation of OSELM is that the number of hidden nodes (HN), which controls the model complexity, remains the same as in the initial model, even when the arrival of new data renders the fixed number of HN sub-optimal. A new variable complexity online sequential extreme learning machine (VC-OSELM), proposed in Chapter 4, automatically adds or removes HN as online learning proceeds, so the model complexity self-adapts to the new data. For streamflow predictions at lead time of one day, VC-OSELM outperformed OSELM when the initial number of HN turned out to be smaller or larger than optimal. In summary, by using linear least squares instead of nonlinear optimization, ELM offers a major advantage over a traditional method like ANN. In situations where new data arrive continually, OSELM and VC-OSELM were shown in this thesis to be more useful than ANN and OSMLR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it