MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2535399616 · doi:10.14288/1.0305711

Short-term hydro-meteorological forecasting with extreme learning machines

2016· article· en· W2535399616 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aranildo R. Lima

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)MeteorologyEnvironmental scienceClimatologyWeather forecastingComputer scienceGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In machine learning (ML), the extreme learning machine (ELM), a feedforward neural network model which assigns random weights in the single hidden layer and optimizes only the weights in the output layer, has the fully nonlinear modelling capability of the traditional artificial neural network (ANN) model but is solved via linear least squares, as in multiple linear regression (MLR). Chapter 2 evaluated ELM against MLR and three nonlinear ML methods (ANN, support vector regression and random forest) on nine environmental regression problems. ELM was then developed for short-term forecasting of hydro-meteorological variables. In situations where new data arrive continually, the need to make frequent model updates often renders ANN impractical. An online learning algorithm – the online sequential extreme learning machine (OSELM) – is automatically updated inexpensively as new data arrive. In Chapter 3, OSELM was applied to forecast daily streamflow at two small watersheds in British Columbia, Canada, at lead times of 1–3 days. Predictors used were weather forecast data generated by the NOAA Global Ensemble Forecasting System (GEFS), and local hydro-meteorological observations. OSELM forecasts were tested with daily, monthly or yearly model updates, with the nonlinear OSELM easily outperforming the benchmark, the online sequential MLR (OSMLR). A major limitation of OSELM is that the number of hidden nodes (HN), which controls the model complexity, remains the same as in the initial model, even when the arrival of new data renders the fixed number of HN sub-optimal. A new variable complexity online sequential extreme learning machine (VC-OSELM), proposed in Chapter 4, automatically adds or removes HN as online learning proceeds, so the model complexity self-adapts to the new data. For streamflow predictions at lead time of one day, VC-OSELM outperformed OSELM when the initial number of HN turned out to be smaller or larger than optimal. In summary, by using linear least squares instead of nonlinear optimization, ELM offers a major advantage over a traditional method like ANN. In situations where new data arrive continually, OSELM and VC-OSELM were shown in this thesis to be more useful than ANN and OSMLR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207