MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538047945 · doi:10.1109/tic-sth.2009.5444442

Image processing for colour blindness correction

2009· article· en· W2538047945 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicColor Science and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlindnessComputer visionArtificial intelligenceColour VisionFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceOptometryMathematicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colour blindness is a genetic mutation that alters the colour vision of the subjects by decreasing the sensitivity to certain colour wavelengths, depending on the defect. There are many forms of colour blindness ranging from monochromacy (black-white) to the most common form, the ¿red-green¿ variation where reds or greens are weakened, the vibrant shades are easily seen and the dull shades are difficult to perceive. A filter was designed based on the Ishihara colour tests in order to correct the colour blind deficiencies. This was successful for seeing the hidden objects within the test plates but did not translate well for real world images. The filter was modified, removing the dullest/lightest shades and shifting all the shades to the darker vibrant shades. The original image was shown to colour blind and normal vision subjects with results varying among all the subjects. After the modified filter was applied to a natural image, the colour blind and normal vision subjects were all able to correctly identify the test colours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicColor Science and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207