MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538248821 · doi:10.11159/icsenm16.116

Development of a New Steel Moment Connection

2016· article· en· W2538248821 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgy and Material Forming
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnection (principal bundle)Moment (physics)Computer scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steel moment frames are widely used in buildings subjected to lateral loads such as wind and earthquakes. This paper summarizes development of a new economical steel moment connection for use in highly seismic areas. The highly ductile new connection is primarily utilizing ductility of the gusset plate to provide necessary rotational capacity while the entire beam and column being connected remain essentially elastic. Due to the desirable performance of the connection and the flat geometry of the gusset plate, the proposed connection is well-suited to be used in steel and composite special ductile moment frames, special steel shear walls and dual systems of moment frames plus special concentrically braced frames, all currently used in seismic lateral force resistance in buildings. The proposed new moment connection can also be used in resisting gravity loads and lateral forces due to wind. In the proposed gusset plate moment connection, the beam is cut short to leave a distance from the column face where yielding and plastic hinge formation are expected to occur primarily due to in-plane yielding of the gusset plate. The gusset plate can either be directly welded to the column or bolted to the column using an end plate. With careful proportioning and proper detailing, the beam is expected to remain essentially elastic during the cyclic loading and no, or minimum continuity plates will be required for the column panel zone. Extensive nonlinear finite element analyses have been conducted. The results indicated that the connection will be very ductile and performs in a very desirable manner when the moment capacity of the gusset plate divided by the moment capacity of the beam ratio is less than 1.0, the thickness of the gusset plate is equal or greater than 1.25 times the beam web thickness and the free gusset plate length is equal to 4 to 6 times the gusset plate thickness. Based on the observation from the studies summarized herein, the use of "Upset bolts" is recommended for the bolted version, where tension bolts connect the gusset plate to the column.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it