MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2538487613 · doi:10.1109/icm.2008.5393805

An area optimized implementation of the Advanced Encryption Standard

2008· article· en· W2538487613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvanced Encryption StandardNISTAES implementationsEncryptionComputer scienceThroughputField-programmable gate arrayEmbedded systemIdentification (biology)CryptographyEncryption softwareComputer hardware56-bit encryptionComputer networkPublic-key cryptographyComputer securityOperating systemWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since its adoption as a new encryption standard by NIST, the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) has become the default choice for various security services in many applications. On the other hand, a straightforward hardware implementation of the AES may not satisfy the tight constraints of several resource limited devices such as radio frequency identification (RFID) tags and tiny sensor networks. In this paper, we explore several area optimization options for the AES. Our area optimized implementation for AES-128 ECB encryption/decryption engine requires 2732 slices of a Xilinx Virtex-II XC2V1000bg575, runs at a maximum clock speed of 98.95 MHz and produces a throughput of up to 29.32 Mbps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it