Modeling ice storm damage to a mature, mixed-species hardwood forest in eastern Ontario
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In January 1998, the worst ice storm of the last century hit regions of southeastern Ontario, Québec, New Brunswick, and the northeastern United States. Using standard multiple regression and classification tree models, we examined the ice damage suffered by trees in a mature, deciduous forest in eastern Ontario at two scales: plot (5 m radius) and individual tree. Canopy trees were damaged significantly more than mid-story trees and there were significant differences among tree species in damage susceptibility. At the plot scale, the best predictors of damage were average tree size and plot species evenness. Plots dominated by large trees were damaged more than those dominated by small trees and plots with higher species evenness suffered higher levels of damage than did less even plots. Models incorporating damage to neighbouring plots explained more variance than did models without the neighbour information. At the individual tree scale, damage suffered by the dominant canopy tree species, sugar maple, was best predicted by tree size. Damage suffered by the dominant mid-story tree species, ironwood, was best predicted by neighbour information and tree size. Disturbances that differentially affect canopy and mid-story layers have been shown to accelerate forest succession by creating light gaps. However, given the species composition and structure of our study forest, we feel that this disturbance will not overly influence forest succession in mature, deciduous forests in eastern Ontario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it