MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2541492143 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2007.4487529

PAPR Reduction in OFDM Systems by Successive Random Sign Negation

2007· article· en· W2541492143 on OpenAlexaff
Shouxing Qu, F. Kohandani, J. Womack

Bibliographic record

VenueConference record/Conference record - Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, & Computers · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPAPR reduction in OFDM
Canadian institutionsBlackberry (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Sign (mathematics)Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexingNegationAlgorithmSet (abstract data type)MathematicsSequence (biology)Simple (philosophy)Computational complexity theoryComputer scienceBlock (permutation group theory)ArithmeticTelecommunicationsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Successive random sign negation (SRSN) is a simple yet effective PAPR reduction method for OFDM. The symbols to be transmitted by an OFDM block are successively multiplied by a set of randomly generated sign-negating sequences (SNS). The multiplications continue until a resultant PAPR which falls below a predefined threshold is found or all SNS in the set are tried. In the latter case, the resultant sequence with minimum PAPR is selected. The average number of sign-negating sequences tried before finding a suitable one and the overall PAPR performance of the technique are analyzed, with analytical results well supported by simulations. SRSN provides substantial PAPR reductions comparable to some existing approaches with lower complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference record/Conference record - Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, & ComputersSame topicPAPR reduction in OFDMFrench-language works237,207