MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2541525300 · doi:10.1109/issoc.2004.1411185

Design for verification of a PCT bus in systemC

2005· article· en· W2541525300 on OpenAlexaff
K. Oumalou, A. Habibi, Sofiène Tahar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSystemCComputer scienceEmbedded systemPCI configuration spaceTransaction-level modelingFinite-state machineUnified Modeling LanguageState (computer science)Computer architecturePCI ExpressProgramming languageSoftwareField-programmable gate array

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an approach to design and verify SystemC intellectual properties (IPs). We considered as an illustrative case a PCI bus modeled as a monitor module that can be interfaced to existent SystemC IPs. We defined three design steps where we first model the bus in UML; then, design it completely with abstract state machines (ASM); and, finally, translate the ASM code to SystemC. We considered an intermediate ASM representation in order to extract the finite state machine of the bus that can be used for model checking of PSL properties. The final SystemC monitor block can be seen as a stand-alone PCI IP as well as a verification module to validate other SystemC PCI compatible devices. Besides, our design offers a flexible and easy to configure an IP that supports a large number of master/slave devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207