Contrasting the summer ecology of white-tailed deer inhabiting a forested and an agricultural landscape
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
: We compared habitat use, home range size, movements, and activity during summer between rural (12 animals km-2) and forest (<; 1 animal km-2) white-tailed deer populations, hypothesizing that competition for natural forage at high density would influence deer behaviour. Biomass of preferred forage at forester sites was 6 times greater in the forest than in the rural landscape. Forest deer avoided conifer and mixed stands, whereas rural deer tended to avoid stands of shade-tolerant hardwoods. Rural deer intensified their use of cultivated fields at night and ate a greater variety of native plants than forest conspecifics, including species rarely consumed by forest deer (e.g., ferns). Rural deer used smaller home ranges but moved at a greater rate than forest counterparts. Activity pattern of deer did not differ between the two landscapes, with peaks at dawn and dusk. Our results suggest that rural deer adapted to the rarity of natural forage by exploiting agricultural crops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it