MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2545745909 · doi:10.1109/nnsp.1995.514919

Nonlinear echo cancellation using a partial adaptive time delay neural network

2002· article· en· W2545745909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoudspeakerAdaptive filterMicrophoneComputer scienceArtificial neural networkSpeech recognitionNonlinear systemEcho (communications protocol)Impulse responseLeast mean squares filterAcousticsFinite impulse responseArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

System identification of a nonlinear loudspeaker/microphone acoustic system is necessary to achieve high acoustic echo cancellation in the handsfree telephony environments where the loudspeaker often operates at high volumes. In this paper, a partial adaptive process consisting of a small order tapped delay line neural network (TDNN) followed by a delayed normalized least mean squares (NLMS) adaptive filter is used to model a loudspeaker/microphone acoustic system. The TDNN models the first part of the acoustic impulse response (AIR) where most of the energy is contained and the delayed NLMS filter models the remaining echo. Experimental measurements confirm that a short length TDNN is capable of improved identification in an undermodelled system and that by extending this to the partial adaptive TDNN structure, the ERLE performance improves by 5.5 dB at high loudspeaker volumes when compared to a NLMS structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207