MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2546522479 · doi:10.3968/8829

The Forecasting of Humanitarian Supplies Demand Based on Gray Relational Analysis and BP Neural Network

2016· article· en· W2546522479 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSafety and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGray (unit)Flood mythDemand forecastingSupply and demandGrey relational analysisOperations researchChinaFlooding (psychology)Context (archaeology)Artificial neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEconomyPolitical scienceHistoryEconomicsPsychologyArchaeologyLawEngineeringMicroeconomicsMathematical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper analyzes the characteristics of humanitarian supplies demand in the context of flood and discusses the disasters associated factors which influence the demand of humanitarian supplies. Then we choose the severe flooding whose grades is more than fifty year return period between 2004 and 2016 as the analysis objects,which is illustrated by the example of the Red Cross Society of China whose demand of relief tent in the flood. Finally, we set up gray relational analysis and BP neural network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it