MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548305205 · doi:10.7939/r3543x

Downward Path Preserving State Space Abstractions

2009· article· en· W2548305205 on OpenAlexaff
Robert C. Holte, Sandra Zilles, Marcel Ball

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpurious relationshipAbstractionHeuristicsProperty (philosophy)Computer scienceState spaceDomain (mathematical analysis)Path (computing)HeuristicTheoretical computer scienceBenchmark (surveying)State (computer science)AlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceProgramming languageMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstraction is a popular technique for speeding up planning and search. A problem that often arises in using abstraction is the generation of abstract states, called spurious states, from which the goal state is reachable in the abstract space but for which there is no corresponding state in the original space from which the goal state can be reached. The experiments in this paper demonstrate that this problem may arise even when standard abstraction methods are applied to benchmark planning problem domains: spurious states cause the pattern databases representing the heuristics to be excessively large and slow down planning and search by reducing the heuristic values. Known automated techniques to get rid of a large portion of spurious states turn out to avoid the memory problem, while at the same time not avoiding the problem of bad heuristic quality. The main contribution of this paper is theoretical. We formally define a characteristic property—the downward path preserving property (DPP)—that guarantees an abstraction will not contain spurious states. How this property can be achieved is studied both for techniques focussing on automated domain-independent abstraction and for techniques focussing on domain-specific abstraction. We analyze the computational complexity of (i) testing the downward path preserving property for a given state space and abstraction and of (ii) determining whether this property is achievable at all for a given state space. Strong hardness results show a close connection between these decision problems and the plan existence problem in typical planning settings including sas and propositional strips. On the positive side, we identify formal conditions under which finding downward path preserving abstractions is provably tractable and show that some popular heuristic search and planning domains have an encoding that matches these conditions. This includes a new encoding of the Blocks World domain, for which DPP abstractions can be easily defined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningFrench-language works237,207