MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548710806 · doi:10.1049/cp.2014.1511

Review on issues related to electric energy demand in distribution system for developing countries

2014· article· en· W2548710806 on OpenAlexaff
Ameena Saad Al‐Sumaiti, M.M.A. Salama

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistribution (mathematics)Computer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electricity consumers in developing countries are in demand for both reliable and high quality electric services to help the economy and support the increase in population. Poor quality of electricity is a major concern for these consumers because of the load shedding problem. This paper focuses on reviewing the current situation of energy demand and the expected load growth in developing countries. Then it will present the main loads contributing to a customer's electricity bill in these countries compared to his monthly income. It will also discuss other factors contributing to the increase in energy demand in developing countries. It will show the effect of increasing energy demand on power supply reflected into power cuts in these countries focusing on introducing the load shedding problem, main power outages, load shedding status in developing countries and the approaches followed in literature to minimize the severity of the problem. Then, the paper will provide the reader with a knowledge based review on distribution generation and renewable energy sources focusing on reviewing the energy demand compared to the available resources and the role of renewable energy sources in facilitating the expansion of electricity supply in developing countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207