MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2548760702

An efficient iterative method for basis pursuit adaptive filters for sparse systems

2012· article· en· W2548760702 on OpenAlexaff
Steven L. Grant, Pratik Shah, Jacob Benesty

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasis pursuitConvergence (economics)Adaptive filterAlgorithmComputer scienceIterative methodBasis (linear algebra)Impulse responseFinite impulse responseMatching pursuitMathematical optimizationMathematicsCompressed sensing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The “proportionate” family of adaptive filters has been in use over the past decade. Their fast convergence for sparse systems makes them particularly useful in the network echo canceller application. Recently, an iterative form of the proportionate affine projection algorithm (PAPA), derived from the basic principles of basis pursuit, has been shown to have remarkably fast convergence for such sparse systems. The number of samples for convergence is proportional to the sparseness of the system which means that often full convergence occurs in fewer samples than the length of the system's impulse response. Here, we introduce a lower complexity implementation with the same performance that is an iterative version of proportionate normalized least mean squares (PNLMS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and ConferenceSame topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207