Online Bayesian Inference of Diffusion Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the process by which a contagion disseminates throughout a network is of great importance in many real-world applications. The required sophistication of the inference approach depends on the type of information we want to extract as well as the number of observations that are available to us. We analyze scenarios in which not only the underlying network structure (parental relationships and link strengths) needs to be detected, but also the infection times must be estimated. We assume that our only observation of the diffusion process is a set of time series, one for each node of the network, which exhibit changepoints when an infection occurs. After formulating a model to describe the contagion, and selecting appropriate prior distributions, we seek to find the set of model parameters that best explains our observations. Modeling the problem in a Bayesian framework, we exploit Monte Carlo Markov Chain, sequential Monte Carlo, and time series analysis techniques to develop batch and online inference algorithms. We evaluate the performance of our proposed algorithms via numerical simulations of synthetic network contagions and analysis of real-world datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it