MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551266388 · doi:10.1109/tnet.2016.2621067

Flexible Caching Algorithms for Video Content Distribution Networks

2016· article· en· W2551266388 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheServerThe InternetComputer networkOnline algorithmAlgorithmEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionGreedy algorithmCache algorithmsContent deliveryDistributed computingCPU cacheOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global video content distribution networks (CDNs) serve a significant fraction of the entire Internet traffic. Effective caching at the edge is vital for the feasibility of these CDNs, which can otherwise incur substantial costs and overloads in the Internet. We analyze the challenges and requirements for content caching on the servers of these CDNs which cannot be addressed by standard solutions. We design multiple algorithms for this problem: a LRU-based baseline to address the requirements; a flexible ingress-efficient algorithm; an offline cache aware of future requests (greedy) to estimate the maximum efficiency we can expect from any online algorithm; an optimal offline cache (for limited scales); and an adaptive ingress control algorithm for reducing the server's peak upstream traffic. We use anonymized actual data from a global video CDN to evaluate the algorithms and draw conclusions on their suitability for different settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it