MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2551400655 · doi:10.1111/gfl.12180

The effects of basement faults on thermal convection and implications for the formation of unconformity‐related uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin, Canada

2016· article· en· W2551400655 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeofluids · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersCameco
KeywordsGeologyUnconformityConvectionConvection cellFault (geology)Geothermal gradientPetrologyBasementFluid dynamicsStructural basinPlumeUpwellingGeophysicsUranium oreThermalShear (geology)GeochemistryGeomorphologySeismologyNatural convectionUraniumMechanicsCombined forced and natural convectionMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The formation of the world‐class, high‐grade unconformity‐related uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin (Canada) requires circulation of large amounts of fluids, the mechanisms for which are still not well understood. Recent studies advocate thermal convection as a possible driving force for the fluid flow related to uranium mineralization; however, little is known regarding how basement faults, which are spatially associated with most unconformity‐related uranium deposits, influence fluid convection and how this may affect the localization of mineralization. This study addresses these questions through simulations of thermal convection with various configurations of basement faults using the FLAC 3D software. Modelling results indicate that the location, spacing, orientation and thermal conductivities of basement faults influence the size and location of thermally driven fluid convection. In a model with a single isolated fault, the fault coincides with an upwelling plume and the dip angle of the fault does not affect the fluid flow pattern; when the fault is moved laterally, the upwelling plume shifts accordingly. In the case of two vertical faults, the faults may either coincide with upwelling flow between two convection cells or be located below individual convection cells, depending on fault spacing. In the latter case, fluid may flow into and out of individual fault zones. Similar results were also obtained for models with two nonvertical (i.e. dipping) faults. Convective flow can penetrate the uppermost basement when the permeability is less than two orders of magnitude lower than that of the overlying sandstone. In this case, the basement faults not only can control the location of ascending flow, but also can passively act as fluid conduits of either flow from the basin into the basement (ingress), or flow from the basement into the basin (egress), depending on their thermal conductivities and relative locations in the models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.841

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it