Spontaneous Splenic Rupture Following Bouts of Coughing: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Splenic rupture due to trauma is relatively common. However, spontaneous non-traumatic ruptures do occur. Causes include infection, neoplasia and infiltrative process. We present an unique case of a 59-year-old patient who presented with dyspnea and left upper abdominal discomfort following bouts of coughing, and was provisionally diagnosed as pulmonary embolism. CT scan revealed splenic rupture. Only a few case reports are published documenting spontaneous splenic rupture following coughing. The therapy of choice can vary between patients depending on the grade of splenic rupture, hemodynamic instability, availability of endovascular treatment and physician preference. Treatment should be focused on preserving splenic tissue if feasible. Non-traumatic rupture of the spleen must be considered in patients presenting with left-sided upper abdominal pain even without evident history of trauma, since early recognition and treatment can prevent serious morbidity and mortality. J Curr Surg. 2016;6(3-4):81-85 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcs308w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it