MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2553914476

Generalized Multiplicative Error Models: Asymptotic Inference and Empirical Analysis

2015· dissertation· en· W2553914476 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qian Li

Bibliographic record

VenueMOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical and numerical algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplicative functionInferenceMathematicsApplied mathematicsEconometricsStatisticsMathematical economicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation consists of two parts.The first part focuses on extended Multiplicative Error Models (MEM) that include two extreme cases for nonnegative series.These extreme cases are common phenomena in high-frequency financial time series.The Location MEM(p,q) model incorporates a location parameter so that the series are required to have positive lower bounds.The estimator for the location parameter turns out to be the minimum of all the observations and is shown to be consistent.The second case captures the nontrivial fraction of zero outcomes feature in a series and combines a so-called Zero-Augmented general F distribution with linear MEM(p,q).Under certain strict stationary and moment conditions, we establish a consistency and asymptotic normality of the semiparametric estimation for these two new models.The second part of this dissertation examines the differences and similarities between trades in the home market and trades in the foreign market of cross-listed stocks.We exploit the multiplicative framework to model trading duration, volume ii per trade and price volatility for Canadian shares that are cross-listed in the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX).We explore the clustering effect, interaction between trading variables, and the time needed for price equilibrium after a perturbation for each market.The clustering effect is studied through the use of univariate MEM(1,1) on each variable, while the interactions among duration, volume and price volatility are captured by a multivariate system of MEM(p,q).After estimating these models by a standard QMLE procedure, we exploit the Impulse Response function to compute the calendar time for a perturbation in these variables to be absorbed into price variance, and use common statistical tests to identify the difference between the two markets in each aspect.These differences are of considerable interest to traders, stock exchanges and policy makers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.041
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.162
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0410.162
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri)Same topicStatistical and numerical algorithmsFrench-language works237,207