MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554001956 · doi:10.1109/mcc.2016.107

Privacy-Preserving Access to Big Data in the Cloud

2016· article· en· W2554001956 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Cloud Computing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceCloud service providerComputer securityData accessService providerHeuristicCloud storageBig dataCloud computing securityInformation privacyData securityLoad balancing (electrical power)DatabaseService (business)Distributed computingEncryptionOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud storage can simplify data management and reduce data maintenance costs. However, many users and companies hesitate to move their data to cloud storage because of security and privacy concerns about third-party cloud service providers. Oblivious RAM (ORAM) aims to enable privacy-preserving access to data stored in the cloud. This article offers a tutorial on ORAM and surveys recent literature. The authors also study the access load-balancing problem when applying ORAM to big data in the cloud. They propose heuristic algorithms to achieve access load balancing in both static and dynamic deployments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.764
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0160.008
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it