MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2554527937 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2016.2619324

A Fast Polar Code List Decoder Architecture Based on Sphere Decoding

2016· article· en· W2554527937 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsPolar codeComputer scienceList decodingThroughputPolarAlgorithmError detection and correctionCode (set theory)Sequential decodingSoft-decision decoderConcatenated error correction codeTelecommunicationsBlock codeSet (abstract data type)Wireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polar codes are a recently discovered family of capacity-achieving error-correcting codes. Among the proposed decoding algorithms, successive-cancellation list decoding guarantees the best error-correction performance with codes of moderate lengths, but it yields low throughput. Speed-up techniques have been proposed in the past: most of them rely on approximations that degrade the error-correction capability of the algorithm. We propose a speed-up technique for successive-cancellation list decoding of polar codes that is exact for list size of 2, while its approximations bring negligible error-correction performance degradation (<;0.05 dB) for other list sizes. A decoder architecture is designed: the proposed technique increases the throughput of a factor of 3.16×, at the cost of 14.2% in area occupation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it