MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2555395799 · doi:10.1145/2910674.2910703

A New Approach of Facial Expression Recognition for Ambient Assisted Living

2016· article· en· W2555395799 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacial expression recognitionComputer scienceFacial expressionAssisted livingFacial recognition systemExpression (computer science)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ambient Assisted Living and Ambient Intelligence have seen their impact greatly grows, especially these last decades. It is mainly due to the increase of the ageing population and people with cognitive diseases. Several technologies were developed to make the use of assistive technology more acceptable and comfortable for the elderly in order to reduce or even replace the human assistance. However, there are many challenges and issues, especially in the interaction between the elderly and assistive systems. To make the system interact as human beings, emotions were used. In this paper, we present a new approach to recognize emotions based on facial expressions represented by images. It is based on a new method for feature selection based on distances. We also suggest the use of the well-known K-Nearest Neighbor classifier with optimized parameters. This approach is found effective when tested using two different datasets of images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207