MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2556972819 · doi:10.1353/not.2016.0138

The Manual of Musical Instrument Conservation by Stewart Pollens

2016· article· en· W2556972819 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNotes · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Musicological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusicalIndex (typography)Visual artsArtArt historyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Manual of Musical Instrument Conservation by Stewart Pollens Robert Adelson The Manual of Musical Instrument Conservation. By Stewart Pollens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. [ix, 448 p. ISBN 9781107077805 (hardcover), $150; ISBN 9781316309742 (e-book), $120.] Illustrations, tables, bibliography, index. Stewart Pollens is one of the leading authorities on the care of historical musical instruments, having served as musical instrument conservator at the Metropolitan Museum of Art from 1976 to 2006. Over the course of those three decades, he helped to preserve and restore their collection of over five thousand objects, including some of the world’s most famous keyboard and bowed string instruments. In his most recent book, The Manual of Musical Instrument Conservation, Pollens has distilled the wisdom and experience derived from his museum work, drawing on a “shop notebook” in which he recorded his daily work on the collection. The book is organized in the form of a dictionary, with 118 alphabetically-arranged entries, from “Acoustics” to “Wood-working.” The entries vary in length from a mere few lines in the case of entries for “Gold and gold-plated brass and bronze” or “Epoxy removal,” to veritable articles spanning a dozen or more pages, on such topics as “Historical metrology,” “Organ restoration,” and “Stringed-keyboard restoration.” This is therefore not a book one would necessarily read from beginning to end, but the author provides both a convenient table of contents that includes all of the entry titles, and a detailed index, which can be used for finding matters that are discussed in multiple entries. Moreover, each entry ends with a list of references for further reading on the topic. This book will be useful to many categories of readers, not only the small population of professional conservators of musical instruments. Any museum professional will find Pollens’s work valuable for dealing with myriad situations with which they may be confronted, from restringing a harp to [End Page 313] moving a piano or cleaning a trumpet. Instrument builders will also benefit from Pollens’s observations, especially if they repair historical instruments or make reproductions of such instruments. Finally, musicians who read this book will come away with a better understanding of the issues that concern the preservation of the tools of their trade. The concept of this book is highly original. It does not aim to replace any of the existing texts on the conservation of specific instrument types, such as keyboards or violins. Nor does the book attempt to present a deontological approach to instrument conservation, especially when it comes to the thorny question of whether historical instruments should be restored to playing condition. On this issue, Pollens writes, “In general, I neither advocate nor disapprove of the restoration of historic musical instruments; rather I believe that each instrument and proposed treatment must be considered on a case-by-case basis with consideration given to the requirements and needs of the collection or owner” (p. 2). The only work that resembles Pollens’s book is The Care of Historic Musical Instruments, edited by Robert L. Barclay (Edinburgh, Ottawa: Museums and Galleries Commission, Canadian Conservation Institute, 1997), but the differences in approach and emphases between Pollens, a string and keyboard specialist, and Barclay, a brass specialist, make for stimulating comparisons. The topics covered in the book range from general themes (“Acoustics” and “Authentication”) and philosophical or deontological issues (“Ethics” and “Conservation reports”) to more specialized subjects pertaining to the materiality of conservation (“Benzotriazole,” “Bleach,” “Brass and bronze alloys,” and “Glues, pastes and other adhesives”). Many of the entries take the form of utilitarian research tools and tables (“Cents conversion,” “Dictionary of common and obsolete chemical terms,” and “Historical metrology”) while others give practical information for specific conservation treatments (“Brass and nickel silver cleaning,” “Drill bit sizes (fractional inch, number and letter, and metric),” “Grit size comparison chart,” “Handling, storage, and transportation of musical instruments: general guidelines,” “Tap drill sizes,” and “Tapered reamers”). Pollens also includes a useful entry on recording musical instruments, an activity vital to many conservation projects, particularly if the instrument in question is preserved in a playable state. The interdisciplinary nature of the book results from the multitude of factors that come...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.140 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it