MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557322617 · doi:10.3303/cet1335015

Process Intensification Alternatives in the DME Production

2013· article· en· W2557322617 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsAkzoNobel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess engineeringSequential quadratic programmingReactive distillationProcess (computing)DistillationProduction (economics)Dimethyl etherFractionating columnComputer scienceProcess integrationEnvironmental scienceEngineeringQuadratic programmingMathematical optimizationChemistryMathematicsCatalysisOrganic chemistryEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing demand for dimethyl ether (DME) requires novel technological solutions able to overcome the drawback of energy intensive distillation steps, and to reduce the overall costs of the current process. This study provides a brief overview of process intensification alternatives for the DME production based on dividing-wall column (DWC) technology and reactive distillation (RD). Rigorous simulations were performed in AspenTech Aspen Plus, where all alternatives based on DWC, RD and R-DWC, were optimized using sequential quadratic programming (SQP). The newly proposed processes allow significant energy savings, while using less equipment units and simplifying the overall process operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it