MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2557322617 · doi:10.3303/cet1335015

Process Intensification Alternatives in the DME Production

2013· article· en· W2557322617 on OpenAlexaff
Anton A. Kiss, David J.-P.C. Suszwalak, Radu M. Ignat

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProcess Optimization and Integration
Canadian institutionsAkzoNobel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess engineeringSequential quadratic programmingReactive distillationProcess (computing)DistillationProduction (economics)Dimethyl etherFractionating columnComputer scienceProcess integrationEnvironmental scienceEngineeringQuadratic programmingMathematical optimizationChemistryMathematicsCatalysisOrganic chemistryEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing demand for dimethyl ether (DME) requires novel technological solutions able to overcome the drawback of energy intensive distillation steps, and to reduce the overall costs of the current process. This study provides a brief overview of process intensification alternatives for the DME production based on dividing-wall column (DWC) technology and reactive distillation (RD). Rigorous simulations were performed in AspenTech Aspen Plus, where all alternatives based on DWC, RD and R-DWC, were optimized using sequential quadratic programming (SQP). The newly proposed processes allow significant energy savings, while using less equipment units and simplifying the overall process operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.522
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicProcess Optimization and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207