MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558264375 · doi:10.1109/isie.2016.7744871

Digital interpolating peak locator

2016· article· en· W2558264375 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpsamplingLogarithmSIGNAL (programming language)EstimatorCurve fittingComputer scienceAlgorithmPosition (finance)Parameterized complexityMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Locating the position of the peak of an analog signal after it has been sampled is a challenging task with wide-ranging applications. The conventional methods of performing this operation involve either upsampling the digital signal or fitting a parabolic curve to the digital samples. This paper proposes a technique for finding the approximate location of the peak in an analog signal after it has been sampled. The technique involves transforming the sampled data into the logarithm domain and then fitting a parameterized function that is characteristic of the analog signal to the two points neighbouring the peak. The location of the peak is calculated from the parameters obtained in the fitting process. Simulation results show that the proposed estimator significantly outperforms the conventional estimators at a comparable or lower hardware cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it