MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558467339 · doi:10.4043/27395-ms

Oil Exploration and its Relationship to the World of Trapped Micron Scale Fluids: A Review of the Applications of Fluid Inclusion Microscopy to the Study of Aqueous and Hydrocarbon Fluid Dynamics in Sedimentary Basins

2016· review· en· W2558467339 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Technology Conference · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsNalcor Energy (Canada)Memorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluid inclusionsGeologyInclusion (mineral)Hydrocarbon explorationCementation (geology)AuthigenicDrilling fluidMineralogyFluid dynamicsQuartzSubmarine pipelineEvaporiteGeochemistryPetrologyStructural basinDiagenesisDrillingGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringSedimentary rockPaleontologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fluid inclusions are micron scale samples of aqueous and hydrocarbon fluids trapped in annealed microfractures developed during burial, or earlier in authigenic minerals e.g. quartz and/or calcite during cementation. Microscopic studies are carried out on specially prepared doubly polished fluid inclusion wafers (~ 150 microns thick) of well core, sidewall core and cuttings. Using a combination of transmitted light and UV light microscopy, laser Raman microscopy and microthermometry, facilitates the collation and comparison of fluid inclusion data. Textural and compositional data relating to the trapping history of fluids can be further constrained using P-T modelling software. The results of fluid inclusion studies of North Atlantic offshore basins i.e. Irish, and Newfoundland and Labrador offshore sectors highlight the use of these analytical and fluid modelling techniques. For example, Porcupine Basin aqueous basinal fluids trapped in cements are consistently of low to moderate salinity (<10 eq. wt.% NaCl), comparable to those found elsewhere on the Atlantic margins e.g. UK Rockall, West of Shetland region, and in the Jeanne d'Arc Basin offshore Newfoundland and may reflect the paucity of evaporites at depth in these regions (Parnell et al., 1999, Parnell et al., 2001 and Feely and Parnell 2003). Migration of at least two chemically distinct hydrocarbon fluids occurred post cementation, as lateral flow along Jurassic sandstones with limited vertical flow along faults (Conliffe et al., 2009). In the Saglek Basin offshore Labrador both monophase (liquid) and two-phase (liquid + vapour) hydrocarbon fluid inclusions occur in the Cretaceous Markland Formation. The two-phase hydrocarbon inclusions yield homogenisation temperatures of ~80°C. The aqueous fluid inclusions represent low temperature (~100°C) and low salinity (~5 eq.wt% NaCl) fluids, and are similar to those recorded in the Porcupine Basin offshore Ireland. P-T modelling of these fluids indicate trapping pressures and temperatures of ~300 bars and ~110° C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it