Shakespeare and Jonson in ‘A Garden of Tulips’
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
‘A GARDEN OF TULIPS’ is a discrete section of The Mysteries of Love and Eloquence, a commonwealth miscellany edited by Edward Phillips—John Milton’s nephew—who received his education from his uncle, the poet.1 I have catalogued all hitherto unassigned quotations of the section, finding that at least 274 of 277 derive from pre-1655 printed playbooks, including four previously unidentified quotations of Shakespeare and five of Jonson. As it turns out, all but one quotation within ‘Garden’ can be connected back to a single earlier quotation book, which is what makes possible the assignment of several passages that might otherwise have entirely escaped identification. Knowing the direct sources of ‘Garden’ sheds light on some of the pilfering practices of Phillips as an early modern jobbing writer, where recognizing the sources of the dramatic passages that he chose gives a solid indication of the great varieties of theatrical writings in circulation as well as the speeches out of Shakespeare and Jonson which early modern readers were expected to find most amusing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it