MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2558999699 · doi:10.4043/27376-ms

Labrador Deepwater Exploration Insights into its Prospectivity From Broadband Seismic AVO Analysis and Seabed Coring

2016· article· en· W2558999699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Technology Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsNalcor Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoringGeologyProspectivity mappingSubmarine pipelineSeabedAmplitude versus offsetStructural basinOceanographyHydrocarbon explorationDrillingContinental shelfSeismologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Labrador Sea, extending from the Davis Strait in the north, through the Saglek Basin and down to the Hopedale Basin in the south, is one of the largest under-explored areas along the eastern Canadian Margin. Exploration of this region has focused on the continental shelf with 30 wells drilled during the 1970's and 1980's. Most of the wells targeted shelfal structural traps. No exploration has occurred in the slope and deepwater areas. From 2011 to 2015, long offset, broadband 2D seismic data (42,400 km) has been acquired by TGS-PGS in the slope and deepwater regions. The broadband image quality has led to the identification of significant new plays and leads in a region that was never before considered prospective. Several of these leads have the potential for large accumulations of oil and gas. The possibility for oil plays in the area is supported by the presence of natural oil seeps along the slope that were identified by satellite surveys in 2010. The long offset (8 km cable) seismic data has identified AVO anomalies on the far stacks. A new regional rock physics study (2014-15) has permitted the careful analysis of these AVO leads and this is helping to reduce exploration risk factors. The analysis shows the importance of the long offsets to identify and characterize these Class II AVO anomalies. In 2015, a seabed coring survey was conducted to target areas near the oil seeps and over large potential traps. Early results from this work are positive and analysis will continue through the spring of 2016. Heatflow measurements taken during the coring survey are providing inputs for a basin modelling study. In addition, several of the shelfal wells were resampled and fluid inclusion analysis was performed. Early results are showing the presence of liquid hydrocarbon inclusions. All of this work has led to the identification and analysis of large potential traps that could hold major oil accumulations. This paper will provide insights from the new seismic data and the recent studies and analyses to demonstrate this prospectivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it