MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559101150 · doi:10.4043/27364-ms

Probabilistic Assessment of Multi-Year Sea Ice Loads on Upward Sloping Arctic Structures

2016· article· en· W2559101150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArctic Technology Conference · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsCentre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodRandomnessProbabilistic logicCalibrationSea iceRidgeExtreme value theoryComputer scienceProbability distributionGeologyMathematicsStatisticsClimatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multi-year (MY) ridge and level ice interactions with sloping and conical structures involve complex ice feature shapes and ice failure mechanisms. The limited available field data makes calibration of associated load models difficult. To account for associated randomness and uncertainty, models may tend to be on the conservative side. New deterministic algorithms were recently developed to calculate loads more accurately for interactions of MY level ice and MY ridges with an upward sloping structure. This paper presents the application of these recently developed formulations in a probabilistic framework using SILS. SILS is a Monte-Carlo type simulator developed by C-CORE following the general procedures outlined in ISO 19906. Ice and metocean input parameters are defined by the user either as a fixed value (e.g. friction coefficients) or a random distribution (e.g. ice drift speed, floe size). The yearly encounter frequency is first estimated for these ice features for the site of interest. The ice loads are then determined for each of simulated interaction event occurring over the model timespan, using the deterministic load formulations. By simulating a large number of years of ice interactions, design ice loads can be determined that correspond to various low annual probability of exceedances. This paper demonstrates how complex loading scenarios, modelled in terms of idealized deterministic models, can be incorporated within a Monte-Carlo framework to provide design level loads. During the model implementation and analysis of results, significant improvements were identified and implemented in the deterministic model, resulting in a more robust model and better design estimates. The results provide valuable insights regarding model inputs and behaviour corresponding to the extreme design ice loads. An example of a full probabilistic analysis is presented in the paper to illustrate the models. Here the probabilistic framework of SILS is used to assess a Base Case scenario and a number of sensitivity cases using different environmental inputs and model parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it