MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559141242 · doi:10.1109/fie.2016.7757741

Exploring Electrical Engineering through movement: Going with the Flow and Programming Puzzles

2016· article· en· W2559141242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTeaching and Learning Programming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovement (music)Electron flowComputer scienceEngineering educationWork (physics)DisciplineMathematics educationElectrical engineeringEngineering managementEngineeringMechanical engineeringSociologyElectronPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Exploring Electrical Engineering program will electrify your understanding of engineering! Developed as part of a larger K-6 engineering education research initiative, this workshop paper details two activities for exploring electrical and computer engineering concepts for grade 3-5 students through the use of cross-disciplinary concepts in physical education and movement. Activity 1: Going with the Flow uses human electrons and circuit components to demonstrate electron behaviour in parallel and series circuits. Activity 2: Programming Puzzles introduces code design through life-size maze creation and completion. These creative activities have been tested as part of on-going research work in several classrooms, with over 350 elementary school students participating, and have resulted in an increased interest in electrical engineering as a future career.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeaching and Learning ProgrammingFrench-language works237,207