MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2559258189 · doi:10.1109/cec.2016.7744255

Pareto-based many-objective optimization using knee points

2016· article· en· W2559258189 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationMulti-objective optimizationPareto principleComputer scienceMetric (unit)Particle swarm optimizationOptimization problemEvolutionary algorithmPoint (geometry)Set (abstract data type)MathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many real-world optimization problems contain multiple (often conflicting) goals to be optimized simultaneously, commonly referred to as multi-objective problems (MOPs). Currently, there exists a plethora of Pareto optimizers designed to solve MOPs. Previous literature has demonstrated that the performance of these optimizers degrade for problems which possess more than three objectives, known as many-objective problems (MaOPs). The downfall of the traditional Pareto approach is that the dominance-based selection strategy loses effectiveness in distinguishing desirable solutions as the number of objectives grows larger, inhibiting convergence to the true Pareto front. One potential solution to this problem is to utilize the concept of knee points as a secondary metric for optimization. Two new knee-driven algorithms are proposed within this work, namely the knee point driven particle swarm optimization (KnPSO) and knee point driven differential evolution (KnDE) algorithm. Due to the nature of the knee point identification mechanism used, both of these algorithms have the benefit of naturally producing a diverse set of solutions without having to incorporate additional criterion. The existing knee-driven evolutionary algorithm (KnEA) along with the proposed approaches are compared against several non-knee variants. Experimental results on nine challenging MaOPs demonstrate that knee points are a viable option for improving the performance of Pareto-based approaches. The knee point driven algorithms are shown to produce significantly higher inverted generational distance and hypervolume metric values in comparison to their non-knee counterparts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it