MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560352004 · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.061

17th Century Variola Virus Reveals the Recent History of Smallpox

2016· article· en· W2560352004 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Biology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPoxvirus research and outbreaks
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchMcMaster University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaSigrid Juséliuksen SäätiöJane ja Aatos Erkon SäätiöNational Health and Medical Research CouncilCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchAcademy of FinlandCanada Research ChairsSuomalais-Norjalainen Lääketieteen SäätiöFinska LäkaresällskapetNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster UniversityWellcome TrustMichael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research, McMaster University
KeywordsSmallpoxVariola virusSmallpox virusVirologyOrthopoxvirusSmallpox vaccineVacciniaBiologyVaccination

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smallpox holds a unique position in the history of medicine. It was the first disease for which a vaccine was developed and remains the only human disease eradicated by vaccination. Although there have been claims of smallpox in Egypt, India, and China dating back millennia [1Fenner F. Henderson D. Arita I. Jezek Z. Ladnyi I. Smallpox and Its Eradication. World Health Organization, 1988Google Scholar, 2Hopkins D. The Greatest Killer: Smallpox in History. University of Chicago Press, 2002Crossref Google Scholar, 3McNeill W. Plagues and Peoples. Anchor, 2010Google Scholar, 4Li Y. Carroll D.S. Gardner S.N. Walsh M.C. Vitalis E.A. Damon I.K. On the origin of smallpox: correlating variola phylogenics with historical smallpox records.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007; 104: 15787-15792Crossref PubMed Scopus (128) Google Scholar], the timescale of emergence of the causative agent, variola virus (VARV), and how it evolved in the context of increasingly widespread immunization, have proven controversial [4Li Y. Carroll D.S. Gardner S.N. Walsh M.C. Vitalis E.A. Damon I.K. On the origin of smallpox: correlating variola phylogenics with historical smallpox records.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007; 104: 15787-15792Crossref PubMed Scopus (128) Google Scholar, 5Babkin I.V. Babkina I.N. A retrospective study of the orthopoxvirus molecular evolution.Infect. Genet. Evol. 2012; 12: 1597-1604Crossref PubMed Scopus (26) Google Scholar, 6Babkin I.V. Babkina I.N. The origin of the variola virus.Viruses. 2015; 7: 1100-1112Crossref PubMed Scopus (44) Google Scholar, 7Esposito J.J. Sammons S.A. Frace A.M. Osborne J.D. Olsen-Rasmussen M. Zhang M. Govil D. Damon I.K. Kline R. Laker M. et al.Genome sequence diversity and clues to the evolution of variola (smallpox) virus.Science. 2006; 313: 807-812Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar, 8Hughes A.L. Irausquin S. Friedman R. The evolutionary biology of poxviruses.Infect. Genet. Evol. 2010; 10: 50-59Crossref PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar, 9Shchelkunov S.N. How long ago did smallpox virus emerge?.Arch. Virol. 2009; 154: 1865-1871Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar]. In particular, some molecular-clock-based studies have suggested that key events in VARV evolution only occurred during the last two centuries [4Li Y. Carroll D.S. Gardner S.N. Walsh M.C. Vitalis E.A. Damon I.K. On the origin of smallpox: correlating variola phylogenics with historical smallpox records.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007; 104: 15787-15792Crossref PubMed Scopus (128) Google Scholar, 5Babkin I.V. Babkina I.N. A retrospective study of the orthopoxvirus molecular evolution.Infect. Genet. Evol. 2012; 12: 1597-1604Crossref PubMed Scopus (26) Google Scholar, 6Babkin I.V. Babkina I.N. The origin of the variola virus.Viruses. 2015; 7: 1100-1112Crossref PubMed Scopus (44) Google Scholar] and hence in apparent conflict with anecdotal historical reports, although it is difficult to distinguish smallpox from other pustular rashes by description alone. To address these issues, we captured, sequenced, and reconstructed a draft genome of an ancient strain of VARV, sampled from a Lithuanian child mummy dating between 1643 and 1665 and close to the time of several documented European epidemics [1Fenner F. Henderson D. Arita I. Jezek Z. Ladnyi I. Smallpox and Its Eradication. World Health Organization, 1988Google Scholar, 2Hopkins D. The Greatest Killer: Smallpox in History. University of Chicago Press, 2002Crossref Google Scholar, 10Paulet J.J. Histoire de la Petite Vérole: Avec les Moyens d'en Préserver les Enfans et d'en Arrêter la Contagion en France. Volume 1. Ganeau, 1768Google Scholar]. When compared to vaccinia virus, this archival strain contained the same pattern of gene degradation as 20th century VARVs, indicating that such loss of gene function had occurred before ca. 1650. Strikingly, the mummy sequence fell basal to all currently sequenced strains of VARV on phylogenetic trees. Molecular-clock analyses revealed a strong clock-like structure and that the timescale of smallpox evolution is more recent than often supposed, with the diversification of major viral lineages only occurring within the 18th and 19th centuries, concomitant with the development of modern vaccination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it