MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2560603743 · doi:10.2140/memocs.2017.5.1

Reducible and irreducible forms of stabilised gradient elasticity in dynamics

2017· article· en· W2560603743 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOtto von Guericke University MagdeburgUniversität Duisburg-EssenFreie Universität BerlinBilkent ÜniversitesiCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversität zu KölnUniversità degli Studi di PaviaAkademie Věd České RepublikyUniversité de LyonUniversität WienMcGill UniversityIndian National Science AcademyCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversidad Rey Juan CarlosUniversity of PittsburghLouisiana State UniversityWayne State UniversityVanderbilt University
KeywordsElasticity (physics)Padé approximantGravitational singularityMathematicsCauchy distributionMathematical analysisBoundary value problemFinite element methodClassical mechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The continualisation of discrete particle models has been a popular tool to
\nformulate higher-order gradient elasticity models. However, a straightforward continualisation
\nleads to unstable continuum models. Pade approximations can be used to stabilise ´
\nthe model, but the resulting formulation depends on the particular equation that is transformed
\nwith the Pade approximation. In this contribution, we study two different stabilised ´
\ngradient elasticity models; one is an irreducible form with displacement degrees of freedom
\nonly, and the other is a reducible form where the primary unknowns are not only displacements
\nbut also the Cauchy stresses — this turns out to be Eringen’s theory of gradient
\nelasticity. Although they are derived from the same discrete model, there are significant
\ndifferences in variationally consistent boundary conditions and resulting finite element implementations,
\nwith implications for the capability (or otherwise) to suppress crack tip
\nsingularities

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it