MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561301484

Automatic Vehicle Detection and Recognition

2016· article· en· W2561301484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle License Plate Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFedDev OntarioUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer vision
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Security is extremely concerning point in distinctive applications, and in vehicle identification it is obligatory to raise alert on any suspicious activity. Such models can be utilized as a part of Border Security, Bank Security etc. In order to detect any vehicle we need to extract its features. Machine vision can be used to extract these features. Furthermore, vehicles have some of the features that may not be unique e.g. color, shape etc. Nevertheless, license plate is a unique identity of a vehicle which can identify its owner. Conversely, it can be tampered with and can be transferred to different vehicle easily. Hence we propose a new model which will combine automated license plate detection along with shape of the vehicle for e.g. SUV, Sedan and Hatchback. Finally, we compare our results with the database which has the legitimate features and information of that vehicle and which will automatically, raise an alert if any discrepancy is found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it