MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2561458395 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2017.7946734

An efficient FPGA implementation of Optical Character Recognition for License Plate Recognition

2017· article· en· W2561458395 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle License Plate Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptical character recognitionComputer scienceLicenseArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkCharacter recognitionField-programmable gate arrayCharacter (mathematics)Feedforward neural networkFeed forwardComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Activation functionSpeech recognitionImage (mathematics)Computer hardwareEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical Character Recognition system (OCR) can be used in intelligent transportation systems for license plate detection. However, most times the systems are unable to work with noisy and imperfect images. In this work, a robust FPGA-based OCR system has been designed and tested with imperfect and noisy license plate images. The OCR system is based on a feedforward neural networks, which uses an efficient and precise neuron. The neuron transfer function is based on an approximation of the Hyperbolic Tangent Activation Function. The neuron is utilized in a 189 − 160 − 36 feed forward neural network configuration. The network parameters were optimized and then tested with noisy images of license plates numbers. The network was able to maintain a 98.2% accuracy in recognizing the characters despite the image imperfections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicle License Plate RecognitionFrench-language works237,207