Responsiveness and reliability of the Sinus Control Test in chronic rhinosinusitis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Sinus Control Test (SCT) is a patient-reported questionnaire designed to help physicians identify sub-optimally controlled chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). This study measures responsiveness to surgery and reliability of the SCT. METHODOLOGY: Adults meeting diagnostic criteria for CRS were recruited from rhinology clinics at a tertiary academic institution. To measure responsiveness, the SCT was administered at baseline and at least 3 months after surgery to 62 CRS patients. To measure reliability, the SCT was administered at two clinical encounters a maximum of 14 days apart to 22 CRS patients. RESULTS: Total SCT scores significantly improved from baseline to post-operative follow-up, and the distribution of patients with total SCT scores falling into the uncontrolled, partially controlled, and controlled categories before and after surgery were significantly different in the direction of improvement. The SCT met minimum standards for reliability and internal consistency as measured by: test-retest reliability coefficient, intra-class correlation coefficients, and item-total correlations. Cronbach alpha; values with each item deleted were lower than the overall Cronbach alpha. The SCT captures the full range of disease control as measured by floor and ceiling effects. CONCLUSION: The SCT is responsive to surgical intervention and a reliable tool to monitor changes in CRS control levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it