Live Broadcast With Community Interactions: Bottlenecks and Optimizations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed the rapid growth of new live broadcast services, represented by Twitch.tv and YouTube live events, where videos are crowdsourced from amateur users (e.g., game players), rather than from commercial and professional TV broadcaster or content providers. The viewers also actively contribute to the content through embedded open-chat channels. Such community interactions among viewers, or even between broadcasters and viewers, make content generation highly diversified and engaging, particularly for the young generation. In this context, cross-viewer synchronization is highly desirable; otherwise the viewers with shorter broadcast latency may act as spoilers, significantly affecting the user experience of other viewers. In this paper, we show that the end-to-end delay has a dramatically amplified impact on the broadcast latency for individual viewers. We suggest smart rate adaptation to achieve cross-viewer synchronization, and develop distributed algorithms based on dual decomposition. We further extend our solution to the cloud environment, and present the concept of ShadowCast, which moves broadcasters to the cloud to provide high-quality streams beyond broadcasters' network bandwidth constraint. Its practicability and effectiveness is demonstrated by our implementation and test bed experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".