“Como hacen los moros a los cristianos”: Raza, género e identidad cultural en “Tarde llega el desengaño” de María de Zayas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo analiza cómo “Tarde llega el desengaño” de María de Zayas se articula en torno a dos espacios orientalizantes: el harén y el estrado. El harén constituye una figura imaginaria que aparece reduplicado de forma fragmentaria en diversas instancias, representando en unas ocasiones un espacio amenazante que implica la reversibilidad de los roles de género, mientras que en otras se transforma en una fantasía de dominio masculino. Por el contrario, el estrado, un espacio heredero del periodo islámico, constituye el lugar de sociabilidad femenina privilegiado en la sociedad española del siglo XVII. A través de la oposición entre estos dos espacios orientalizantes, “Tarde llega el desengaño” explora la interrelación entre los discursos sobre la identidad de género, la jerarquización racial y la otredad etno-religiosa para exponer cómo las categorías sociales son conceptos relacionales y situacionales cuyo significado se redefine según las relaciones de poder de cada contexto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".