MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2563218504 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v40i2.1842

“Como hacen los moros a los cristianos”: Raza, género e identidad cultural en “Tarde llega el desengaño” de María de Zayas

2016· article· es· W2563218504 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Spain
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artículo analiza cómo “Tarde llega el desengaño” de María de Zayas se articula en torno a dos espacios orientalizantes: el harén y el estrado. El harén constituye una figura imaginaria que aparece reduplicado de forma fragmentaria en diversas instancias, representando en unas ocasiones un espacio amenazante que implica la reversibilidad de los roles de género, mientras que en otras se transforma en una fantasía de dominio masculino. Por el contrario, el estrado, un espacio heredero del periodo islámico, constituye el lugar de sociabilidad femenina privilegiado en la sociedad española del siglo XVII. A través de la oposición entre estos dos espacios orientalizantes, “Tarde llega el desengaño” explora la interrelación entre los discursos sobre la identidad de género, la jerarquización racial y la otredad etno-religiosa para exponer cómo las categorías sociales son conceptos relacionales y situacionales cuyo significado se redefine según las relaciones de poder de cada contexto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it