MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2564218200 · doi:10.21511/ppm.14(4-1).2016.16

Forecasting the development of leasing market (on the example of Ukraine)

2016· article· en· W2564218200 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProblems and Perspectives in Management · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeaseQuarter (Canadian coin)BusinessPaymentFinanceIndex (typography)Value (mathematics)Market share

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the study consists in the investigation of the leasing market and determining the prospects of its development in Ukraine, which will make possible for lessors to justify the choice of their strategies. There were forecasted values of the analyzed indicators of leasing market for the following three periods: the third quarter of 2016, fourth quarter of 2016, first quarter of 2017. It was proposed to calculate the integral development index of leasing services in Ukraine based on the amount of leasing companies in Ukraine, the amount of financial leasing contracts, the share of long-term lease agreements, the value of financial leasing contracts, the proportion of borrowed funds in the structure of leasing transactions financing, the share reward the lessor for the leased property in the structure of the lease payments, in the amount of leasing companies in Ukraine, the amount of financial leasing contracts, the share of long-term lease agreements, the value of financial leasing contracts, the proportion of borrowed funds in the structure of leasing transactions financing, the share reward the lessor for the leased property in the structure of the lease payments. The authors defined the growth of Ukrainian leasing market in the first quarter of 2017. The proposed integral development index is applicable both on regional and international level. The results of study can be used for substantiation of the choice of lessors’ strategies by developing alternative strategic decisions, the optimal use of which should lead to a further growth of the leasing market. Keywords: leasing, leasing companies, methods of multivariate statistical analysis, forecasting, market of leasing services. JEL Classification: C53, G17, G21

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.098 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it