MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2566984445

Music Performance Anxiety

2016· article· en· W2566984445 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lynn Helding

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Singing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusicians’ Health and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyPsychologyMusicalPresentation (obstetrics)Coping (psychology)Variety (cybernetics)Music therapyMedical educationPedagogyVisual artsClinical psychologyPsychotherapistPsychiatryMedicineArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ALMOST ALL MUSICIANS HAVE EXPERIENCED performance anxiety. From this one, unifying experience, individual variations abound, from the variety and severity of symptoms, to the regularity of occurrence and the conditions which it appears. Various coping mechanisms practiced by performers range widely as well, from the healthful to the destructive.The topic of performance anxiety was recently explored at a presentation sponsored by the University of Southern California Thornton School of Music's Musician's Wellness Committee.1 This committee made up of faculty and administrators from the Thornton School of Music and health professionals from the Keck School of Medicine, and dedicated to addressing musicians' wellness. I was tasked with background research to establish the current knowledge base and treatment options surrounding this disorder, which we then used as a framework to open up a panel discussion among faculty as professional performers and students as aspiring professionals.Most of this framework was based on the book The Psychology of Music Performance Anxiety by an authority on this subject, Dianna Kenny, Professor of Psychology and Professor of Music at the University of Sydney.2 This installment of Mindful Voice follows that structure, and concludes with several stories by Thornton music faculty who generously shared their personal accounts-which one of the suggested techniques for successfully addressing performance anxiety.MUSIC PERFORMANCE ANXIETY (MPA)Music performance anxiety (henceforward referred to as MPA) ubiquitous among instrumentalists and singers alike. Kenny makes this clear the first chapters of her book, where she recounts tales of debilitating MPA suffered by such musical luminaries as Frederic Chopin, George Harrison, Maria Callas, Donny Osmond, Barbara Streisand, and Tatiana Troyanos, as well as musicians without such international pedigree. As Kenny notes, MPA is no respecter of musical genre, age, gender, years of experience, or level of technical mastery of one's art.3In spite of this, the current state of knowledge both academic and clinical psychology regarding MPA slim. This dearth of information due to a a variety of reasons (which will follow). But first, we might reasonably wonder about the prevalence of MPA; just how many musicians suffer from it? The numbers range as widely as other aspects of MPA, from 15% to 20% one study (which considered only severe performance anxiety), to as high as 59% a Dutch study of orchestral musicians. In the U.S., several studies documented a similar range of results among orchestral musicians (24% to 70%) while a Canadian study found the number as high as 96%.4As Kenny makes clear, current studies on MPA are few and far between; thus, surveys conducted ten to twenty years ago are still referenced the literature.5 One impediment to research the mash-up of terminology (performance anxiety, stage fright, and simple shyness are often used interchangeably) that has not allowed MPA to claim its own distinctive set of traits. Indeed, Kenny has noted that performance anxiety can show up in a range of endeavors, from test-taking, math performance, public speaking, sport, and the performing arts dance, acting and music, yet she makes a strong case for differentiating music from all other performance arenas.6 This differentiation crucial to eventually establishing effective treatments and coping mechanisms, a process heretofore hindered by MPA's entanglement the psychiatric literature with more general social anxiety disorders and social phobias, such as pathological shyness.This entanglement was encoded the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Disorders (DSM), the reference work published by the American Psychiatric Association that considered the norm for nomenclature used by clinicians and researchers for the classification of mental disorders. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of SingingSame topicMusicians’ Health and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207