The Hawthorne Effect in Hand Hygiene Compliance Monitoring
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The Hawthorne effect, or behaviour change due to awareness of being observed, is believed to inflate directly observed hand hygiene compliance rates, but evidence is limited. \nMethods: A real-time location system tracked hospital hand hygiene auditors and recorded alcohol-based hand rub and soap dispenses. Rates of hand hygiene events per dispenser per hour within sight of auditors were compared to dispensers not exposed to auditors. \nResults: The event rate in dispensers visible to auditors (3.75/dispenser/hour) was significantly higher than unexposed dispensers at the same time (1.48) and in prior weeks (1.07). The rate increased significantly when auditors were present compared to five minutes prior to arrival. There were no significant changes inside patient rooms. \nConclusions: Hand hygiene event rates increase in hallways when auditors are visible and the increase occurs after the auditors’ arrival, consistent with the existence of a Hawthorne effect localized to areas where auditors are visible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it