Acute Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Associated With Antibiotic Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori Infections: A Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori infects half the global population. Because serious complications can result from this infection, a so-called "triple therapy" is recommended: treatment with a proton-pump inhibitor and clarithromycin, along with amoxicillin or metronidazole. Although these antibiotics have been associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms, it is difficult to disentangle the effects of antibiotics from the effects of acute infections that may precipitate acute neuropsychiatric symptoms. Study of patients with chronic H. pylori infections who undergo antibiotic treatment may provide a clearer view of the associations between acute neuropsychiatric symptoms and antibiotics. The literature concerning this association in patients with H. pylori has not been reviewed. We therefore undertook a review of MEDLINE and postmarket surveillance data concerning this issue and identified 25 cases. Postmarket data indicated that gastrointestinal symptoms were the most commonly reported adverse reactions, followed by neurological adverse reactions; neuropsychiatric symptoms were less commonly reported, with variable and nonspecific terminology used to describe them. More specific, yet still variable terminology was found in the literature. Anxiety, delirium, dissociation, mania, and psychosis were reported, with approximately half of these neuropsychiatric symptoms occurring without symptoms of delirium. The use of standardized neuropsychiatric symptom rating scales and the Confusion Assessment Method for monitoring adverse reactions may improve our knowledge of neuropsychiatric symptoms and their association with antibiotics and thus mitigate underreporting. Physicians should remain alert to the possibility that neuropsychiatric symptoms may occur during antibiotic treatment of H. pylori and recognize that rapid resolution typically occurs with discontinuation of the antibiotics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".